Are We Managing To Destroy Science? - Reading Test Answers
Complete answer key with detailed explanations
Summary Completion
Question 1
productivity
Location: Paragraph 2
The goal of this regular five-yearly check-up of the university sector is easy to understand: to increase productivity within public sector research.
Question 2
anxiety
Location: Paragraph 3
Academic institutions are already preparing for the RAE with some anxiety—understandably so, for the financial consequences of failure are severe.
Question 3
severe
Location: Paragraph 3
Academic institutions are already preparing for the RAE with some anxiety—understandably so, for the financial consequences of failure are severe.
Question 4
pressures
Location: Paragraph 4
The pressures are forcing research management onto the defensive.
Question 5
publish
Location: Paragraph 4
Common strategies for increasing academic output include grading individual researchers every year according to RAE criteria, pressurising them to publish anything regardless of quality, diverting funds from key and expensive laboratory science into areas of study such as management, and even threatening to close departments.
Question 6
funds
Location: Paragraph 4
Common strategies for increasing academic output include grading individual researchers every year according to RAE criteria, pressurising them to publish anything regardless of quality, diverting funds from key and expensive laboratory science into areas of study such as management, and even threatening to close departments.
Question 7
replace
Location: Paragraph 4
Another strategy being readily adopted is to remove scientists who appear to be less active in research and replace them with new, probably younger, staff.
Question 8
unsustainable
Location: Paragraph 5
Although such measures may deliver results in the RAE , they are putting unsustainable pressure on academic staff.
True False-Not-Given
Question 9
FALSE
Location: Paragraph 6
But prolific publication does not necessarily add up to good science.
Question 10
TRUE
Location: Paragraph 8
Senior academics managing this situation might be well advised to demand a long-term view from the government.
Question 11
NOT GIVEN
Question 12
TRUE
Location: Paragraph 9
Unfortunately, management seems to be pulling in the opposite direction.
Multiple Choice
Question 13
D
Location: Paragraph 6
However, their early publication records would preclude them from academic posts if the present criteria were applied.
Question 14
C
Location: Paragraph 8
It seems that the atmosphere surrounding the RAE may be stifling talented young researchers or driving them out of science altogether. There urgently needs to be a more considered and careful nurturing of our young scientific talent. A new member of academic staff in the chemical or biological laboratory sciences surely needs a commitment to resources over a five- to ten-year period to establish their research.