You should spend about 40 minutes on IELTS writing task 2.
In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give specific reason and explain them with examples from your own experience or knowledge.
You should write at least 250 words in IELTS writing task 2.
Topic : Development
Type : Discussion
People, in a few countries, prefer to have a fast and comprehensive rail communication while others believe that improving the existing road transportation process is a lot more essential and that is why more budget should be spent on roads. This informative article discusses both opinions and includes my opinion before drawing a fair conclusion.
On the one hand, people in favour of having a speedy and reliable train communication system mainly base their ground on the fact that trains may carry a significant number of passengers and goods at a time and can remarkably reduce the traffic congestion. Rail communicating is safer, faster and can connect towns and cities that construct a better communication system than the traditional road transportation system, according to those people. What is more, locomotives are already famous in several countries and have significantly improved communications there. Due to these benefits, people often opine that more money ought to be allocated to building new rail lines. For example, the train system in China has a groundbreaking contribution to enhancing its overall communication system, and many countries have begun adopting this particular model.
On the other hand, the public transport system has an essential role in interconnecting the various pieces of the cities and the highest proportion of individuals use this method to travel to various places. Though trains may enhance the city transport facilities, it is not an alternative to the present road transports. That is the reason why many men and women think that the federal budget should be utilised on enhancing public transportation for the interest of better communication for bulk people. For example, a train line in the united kingdom has always contributed to a fantastic extent to the global transport system in the country. Nonetheless, public transportation has always been the central silent manner for UK taxpayers.
To conclude, I believe that the national budget should be distributed both for the improvement of the rail and public transfers for the overall growth and development of the transportation system.