You should spend about 40 minutes on IELTS writing task 2.
Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give specific reason and explain them with examples from your own experience or knowledge.
You should write at least 250 words in IELTS writing task 2.
Table of Contents
Topic : Information
Type : Discussion
Model Answer 1 :
This age of freedom of speech and democracy, limiting information for the sake of ambiguous public security and national importance seems too any to be quite unfair when others assume that information should only be accessible when the authority finds it appropriate for access. All sides have sons for concerns, and if all information is made available to them, scientific study, academic environment, and business can be significant.
First of all, sensitive information that could breach state security, contribute public outcry, hand technology over to terrorist groups, and promote corporate monopoly in the commercial sector merits review before making it possible. In this digital age, knowledge is spreading like wildfire, and y should be delimited, according to many, for the sake of preserving global peace. For example, if the nuclear technology is exchanged for scientific study with all countries, the world will soon be on the verge of obliteration, given the inconceivable likelihood that this technology has to facilitate the people.
Scientific research, on the contrary, is mostly dependent on available data and previous findings. When valuable information and historical results arc not exchanged freely with scholars and researchers, there will be no global change. For example, the Internet is probably the most significant invention the modern world has made, and if the US military had not introduced this technology, people would still be living in the pre-internet era. However, if they are not enforced in the real world, the curbed knowledge no meaning and thus curbing them is like slaughtering the potential for change. Eventually, world history indicates that the human race has progressed as each knowledge has undergone significant alteration and improvement due to discoveries and inventions shared with the world.
Besides, when curbed and not shared with great minds, knowledge is of limited value. Restriction on valuable information should be debarred for real global change and let people know the truth rather than holding it in the dark.
Model Answer 2 :
Within this age of liberty of speech and democracy, limiting advice for the interest of vague public safety and national significance appears very irrational to many if others assert that data ought to be accessible only when the jurisdiction deems them appropriate for accessibility. Both parties have their motives for disagreements, and I believe that scientific research, instructional arena and also the company can be significantly improved if all info is made available to them.
To start with, sensitive data that could induce state safety, direct to public outcry, hand more technology to terrorist groups and also eases corporate monopoly in commerce industry needs to be inspected before making them more accessible. In this electronic age, information spread like wildfire and also for the interest of maintaining international peace, they ought to be delimited, based on many. As an example, if the atomic technologies are shared with all countries for scientific research, the planet will probably stand on the point of obliteration, even though having an inconceivable chance this technology owns to ease the taxpayers.
To the contrary, scientific study largely depends upon available information and past discoveries. If invaluable info and previous findings are not shares publicly to professors and researchers, then the worldwide advancement will standstill. As an example, the world wide web is possibly the most critical innovation today has generated and when this technology had not been shared with the US army, we would still be dwelling in the pre-internet era. Also, the suppressed data does not have any value if they are not implemented in the actual world and so controlling them is similar to slaughtering the prospect of advancement. At length, history implies that the human race has progressed, thanks to discoveries and innovations contributed to the entire world as every discovering went through profound modification and progress. I consequently personally prefer free advice whatsoever.
In summary, information has restricted value when they are suppressed rather than shared with fantastic minds. For the authentic international advancement, limitation on valuable advice Ought to Be debarred and let folks know the facts.